Discussão geral

[Bruno Nobre]

lol... coitado do albers...

[Luis Azinheira]

ArraySurpresas positivas:

-Toyotas
-SuperAguris

-Hamilton
-Sutil
-Webber

Negativas:

-Honda
-Coulthard

Agora vamos tentar perceber o raio das estratégias de corrida com 2 tipos de pneus, porque a coisa ainda está um bocado no segredo dos deuses.[/quote]

so nao percebo porque consideras o coulthard uma surpresa negativa, para mim foi o que esperava dele.
ferrari com o melhor carro e melhor piloto na frente, mclaren com bons carros, mas o palonso jamais será campeao sem ser à custa dos azares alheios, logo.... fiabilidade no ferrari e hipoteses do alonso goradas... ja o hamilton mostra talento natural. bmws, muito bem, com 2 pilotos em caminho inverso, com kubica em crescendo na sua carreira e heidfeld, como a ultima paragem para nao ser a eterna esperança, de resto, sublinhar os aguris, muito bem

[Berto Carvalho]

Arrayso nao percebo porque consideras o coulthard uma surpresa negativa, para mim foi o que esperava dele.
ferrari com o melhor carro e melhor piloto na frente, mclaren com bons carros, mas o palonso jamais será campeao sem ser à custa dos azares alheios, logo.... fiabilidade no ferrari e hipoteses do alonso goradas... ja o hamilton mostra talento natural. bmws, muito bem, com 2 pilotos em caminho inverso, com kubica em crescendo na sua carreira e heidfeld, como a ultima paragem para nao ser a eterna esperança, de resto, sublinhar os aguris, muito bem[/quote]
:rolleyes:Em 2006 teve pior fiabilidade que o Schumacher... Será que é coincidencia a Renault ter baixado tanto de forma depois da saida do Alonso?

[Marco Ribeiro]

pessoal e se criassem um topico para cada corrida? este era só para discuçao geral até ao começo :)

[Filipe Santos]

Ta um topico aberto sobre o gp:fixe:

[Berto Carvalho]

ArrayF1 EXCLUSIVE: &quot;Moving&quot; Ferrari Floor Under Scrutiny From Rivals<!--sizec--><!--/sizec-->
Written by: Adam Cooper, RACER Magazine
Melbourne, Australia – 3/19/2007

Ferrari’s floor has come under scrutiny from rival teams, who suspect there may be a mechanism that allows it to move illegally.

Although he did not name Ferrari or specify floors, McLaren boss Ron Dennis says he is confident that are cars whose performance will be affected in the near future if certain technical rule interpretations are clarified.

If the front of the floor drops at speed it could create an aerodynamic stall, which improves straightline performance.

That won’t necessarily show up with stunning speed trap figures, as it could also allow cars to run a bit more wing and have better performance – with less taken out of the tires – in the corners.

The rules allow for a certain amount of “absorption” in that area of the car because the floor takes a lot of punishment from the curbs, and if it is too rigid, the chassis would suffer. However, if the floor is actually capable of lowering, it would be an illegal movable aerodynamic device.

All cars have a form of stay holding the front of the floor in place, but rivals noticed an unusually complex arrangement on the Ferrari when the bodywork was off the car in the Melbourne pit garage.

The FIA placed a particular emphasis on examining floors at Melbourne, and took a close look at the Ferrari. Sources close to the FIA suggest that at this stage the team has been given the benefit of the doubt. The current FIA test on that part of the car apparently involves only checking with an upward force.

As with last year’s flexing wing affair, in the early races teams are often told privately by the FIA to change suspect elements of their cars for future events. Often that process is kick-started by informal complaints or evidence from other teams.

Dennis has made it clear to us that he suspects that there are some illegal cars in the pitlane.

“We will see how things are in two or three races,” he told speedtv.com. “There is a whole range of things that come to light in the first race and you go and you say what is legal, and what is not legal. Most teams are given that current race to enjoy the benefit of the doubt. I think there will be a rationalization of some aspects of some cars that would close the gap if no one did anything.

“You look at people’s cars, you are not always of the opinion that rule interpretation has been strictly adhered to, and you get in to, ‘Hold on a second, what are we allowed to do and what are we not allowed to do?’ and that always takes place at the first event. So it takes a race or two to know what is or isn’t permitted.”

Questioned by SPEEDtv.com, a dismissive Ferrari spokesman said: “It’s part of the game any time Ferrari is quickest. It’s not the first time that there have been questions about legality. If someone has a complaint, there is always the FIA.”[/quote]
http://www.speedtv.com/articles/auto/formulaone/36099/

Interessante..:g:

[iceman]

Começam as desculpas para justificar o &quot;esmagamento&quot; que aconteceu em melbourne. :nono:

[Berto Carvalho]

ArrayComeçam as desculpas para justificar o &quot;esmagamento&quot; que aconteceu em melbourne. :nono:[/quote]Ou começaram as desculpas ou recomeçaram as batot... pardão ilegalidades de Ferrari.
É normal que se investigue, o pior era deixar passar sem tirar as duvidas, e se realmente o Ferrari está ilegal? O mais certo é não estar mas nunca se sabe.
Também é normal que as equipas lancem estas desconfianças, basta ver no ano passado com as asas da Ferrari, as suspenções da renault, em 2003 quando a Ferrari protestou os pneus Michelin, em 98 quando protestaram o sistema de travagem da Mclaren, etc

[Marco]

é realmente muito mesquinho do careca dos taxis.
para alem de obrigarem o cafe creme a ficar 2 seg a mais parado na pit, ainda vem com desculpas de mau pagador...
lamentavel....

[Rui Sousa]

Olha ele... olha...olha!!!

Continua é a fugir com o cu a seringa (tópico errado), penso eu de que...